<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
Hey,
<br>
</div>
<div class="default-style">
<br>
</div>
<div class="default-style">
so I decided to go away from Monticello packages for these very large source code files and switch to pure topaz code - the process does not seem to be reliable when the stuff is getting too large. I had to reinstall Gemstone database and got again the same problems - topaz code is loading much faster and the loading has ever worked ...
<br>
</div>
<div class="default-style">
<br>
</div>
<div class="default-style">
Marten
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
Marten Feldtmann via Glass <glass@lists.gemtalksystems.com> hat am 27.02.2022 18:25 geschrieben:
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div class="default-style">
Hey,
<br>
</div>
<div class="default-style">
<br>
</div>
<div class="default-style">
I am currently working with Gemstone/S 3.6.3 and today I had lots of problems, loading large software packages via Gopher - the topaz process (using Gopher) got killed (as it seems) by the operating system when loading the software, no message and the putty session got killed also.
<br>
</div>
<div class="default-style">
<br>
</div>
<div class="default-style">
I am heavily model based working, so the complete domain model, the API model and APIs itselfs, the OpenAPI specification, the documentation are generated in Smalltalk source code. My - by far - largest application produces 18 MByte of source code (topaz-pure code).
</div>
<div class="default-style">
<br>
</div>
<div class="default-style">
The generator generates topaz source code (18 MB) which is normally loaded once and then (from within Jade) I produce a Monticello package (3.6 MB) and for further work I use these Monticello packages.
<br>
</div>
<div class="default-style">
<br>
</div>
<div class="default-style">
Today I measured the loading time: 6 minutes (topaz) against 24 minutes (monticello) on the same machine - I assume, that a git based solution will not be much better, perhaps even worse ?
<br>
</div>
<div class="default-style">
<br>
</div>
<div class="default-style">
Just for your information purposes ....
<br>
</div>_______________________________________________ Glass mailing list Glass@lists.gemtalksystems.com https://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>