<!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10.10.24 14:53, Patrik Svestka via Glass wrote: </div> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:ee81e314628aca68b0e7c679297655d74dff89fb.camel@finworks.biz"> <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap=""> I'm rather confused what is supported and production ready IDE by GemTalk and what is not. I had checked the GemTalk System's repositories @github prior writing to the mailing list. I projects like Jadeite (fork of Jade), JadeiteForPharo, Sparkle and PharoGemStoneFFI. </pre> </blockquote> Yes, the situation is a total mess - and these are the most friendly words I can find for it. I honestly do not know, how to handle the situation in the future with this wonderful database. A total needless source code management change starting in 3.7.0, reinventing structures known in ENVY for the last 30 years. Is this really needed ? Looking into other environments I noticed how the infrastructure is growing, but in this area the infrastructure is destroyed every few years just to restart and make it better or worse. For me it seems, that so many people are start working on an IDE for Gemstone/S, but they never finished it. The only one is Jade, and I do not understand, why GemtalkSystems is not simply jumping on that train. Marten </body> </html>