[Glass] case insensitive search broken for Unicode7?

[Gerhard Obermann]

This should work at least:

(Unicode7 withAll: String new) includesString: 'abc'
(Unicode7 withAll: '') includesString: 'abc'

Gerhard


On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Dale Henrichs <
dale.henrichs at gemtalksystems.com> wrote:

> Mariano,
>
> In the shower, after writing the above message, I realized that I am not
> an expert in the specific area where you are having problems ... the
> revamping that I was referring occurred in the area related to mixed
> comparison of Strings and Unicode and not specifically in the area of "case
> insensitive search", although I'm pretty sure that we've done extensive
> work in other areas of unicide support ...
>
> I am still buried so I don't really have the time to research this area,
> but if you supply me with some test cases I can run them against 3.2 and
> determine whether we've addressed your problems in 3.2 ...
>
> I'm from the land of "it doesn't work until I see it work" so your test
> cases are important in case they happen to fall into the cracks in the
> implementation... also it's possible that the GLASS layer is getting in the
> way as well (as I said, I do not have the time to actually look into this)
> ...
>
> If you give me test cases, I will run them against 3.2 and let you know
> what I find out ...
>
> Dale
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Dale Henrichs <
> dale.henrichs at gemtalksystems.com> wrote:
>
>> Mariano,
>>
>> I'm afraid that there is no simple answer ...for 3.2 we ended up making
>> pretty significant changes at both the primitive level and the Smalltalk
>> level and the things we did (mainly at the primitive level ... as Marten
>> has observed) to solve the problem are not easily backported to 3.1.x.
>>
>> It's looking like we will be releasing 3.2 "real soon now" so you might
>> not have to wait long for relief.
>>
>> Dale
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
>> marianopeck at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
>>> marianopeck at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Can anyone confirm a workaround that works from the deepest point so
>>>> that nothing is broken? Because I am finding new problems which seem
>>>> related...so if we can find a workaround from the seed of the problem we
>>>> likely fix all.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Please?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
>>>> marianopeck at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks James.
>>>>> The side effects of this issue is huge, isn't it? I have been
>>>>> debugging issues and problems related to this. Because it's not only
>>>>> #matches: but #includesSubstring:caseSensitive: (when send with false) and
>>>>> many more. I should stop my production system because some load of data etc
>>>>> depends in this type of message and does X or Y depending on the answer of
>>>>> such a message :(
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks in advance,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:25 PM, James Foster <
>>>>> james.foster at gemtalksystems.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:51 PM, James Foster <
>>>>>> james.foster at gemtalksystems.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:47 PM, James Foster <
>>>>>>> james.foster at gemtalksystems.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I added 'asUppercase' to both the receiver and the argument in my
>>>>>>>> code (with a note to remove it later).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But the problem is that lots of methods will be broken....because it
>>>>>>> is all senders of all senders of all senders.. of _findString: subString
>>>>>>> startingAt: startIndex ignoreCase: aBoolean  of Unicode7.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What about this instead:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unicode7 >> _findString: subString startingAt: startIndex
>>>>>>> ignoreCase: aBoolean
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   ^ super _findString: subString startingAt: startIndex ignoreCase:
>>>>>>> aBoolean
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am not aware of any suggested changes to the base classes to fix
>>>>>>> this but I've indicated on the internal bug tracking system that publishing
>>>>>>> a workaround would be appreciated.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks James. Indeed, a workaround is deeply appreciated. Please let
>>>>>> me know if someone pushes one in the bug tacker. Is it public? Because I
>>>>>> don't see anything in
>>>>>> http://gemtalksystems.com/index.php/community/gss-support/resources/bug-notes/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That is where the bug-note would appear when/if it is written.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> James
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Mariano
>>>>> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Mariano
>>>> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mariano
>>> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Glass mailing list
>>> Glass at lists.gemtalksystems.com
>>> http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Glass mailing list
> Glass at lists.gemtalksystems.com
> http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/private/glass/attachments/20140322/f96b67b8/attachment.html>