[Glass] sixx + XmlPullParser in 3.1?

[Dale Henrichs via Glass]

Depending upon the structure that you are exporting STON may need work ...
variable classes with instance variables are not handled cleanly by STON
(see Text) ...

OTOH STON does handle intra-object references ... haven't paid attention to
whether STON recurses through data structures or not which is the thing
that gets you in trouble with the stack size ...

My plate is pretty full, but if I had some pointers as to the problems that
you hit with the XML PULL parser I might be able to pitch in and get over
the hump...


Dale

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Richard Sargent via Glass <
glass at lists.gemtalksystems.com> wrote:

> GLASS mailing list wrote
> > Hi Paul, is that code available somewhere?  (I know where it is STON) but
> > I
> > wonder about all the intercommuication between pharo and gemstone.
> > Does ston load cleanly in Gemstone?  Did you need to modify code in
> either
> > side?
> >
> > ...
> >
> > To be honest, I would prefer ston rather than XML either way.. but sixx
> > seem to have been used quite a lot in Gemstone-Pharo. I am not sure in
> > Gemstone how it would work.
>
> Mariano,
>
> Dale uses STON for all data exchange between GemStone and Pharo in tODE, so
> I think it is safe to say that there is a viable solution for you.
>
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://forum.world.st/Glass-sixx-XmlPullParser-in-3-1-tp4709520p4780794.html
> Sent from the GLASS mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Glass mailing list
> Glass at lists.gemtalksystems.com
> http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/private/glass/attachments/20140926/fa93b1d6/attachment.html>