[Glass] WG: Info on implementation limits

[Dale Henrichs via Glass]

Thanks Christian. We'll let you know what we find out ...

Dale


On 7/12/17 2:37 AM, Christian Haider wrote:
>
> (resent, because Google blocked the attachment)
>
> *Von:*Christian Haider [mailto:christian.haider at smalltalked-visuals.com]
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2017 09:53
> *An:* 'glass at lists.gemtalksystems.com' <glass at lists.gemtalksystems.com>
> *Cc:* 'Dale Henrichs' <dale.henrichs at gemtalksystems.com>
> *Betreff:* AW: [Glass] Info on implementation limits
>
> From replies off list, I heard, that big input files are not a 
> problem. Good to know, thank you.
>
> For the crash on the big method, I investigated and created an input 
> file which reproduces the problem (attached as bigMethod.gs). The log 
> is attached as well.
>
> My theory was wrong. It seems not to be a problem with many literals 
> in a method, but something else.
>
> When I input the file in a Topaz shell (on windows), it works seamless 
> and the method can be called.
>
> Steps:
>
>  1. Login to topaz
>  2. enter ‘output push c:\image\bigMethod.log’[CR]
>  3. enter ‘input c:\image\bigMethod.gs’[CR]
>  4. all fine!
>
> But if I do the same with a batch file which uses the script 
> loadBigMethod.tpz (attached),
>
> The Topaz window opens, it stays there for about 10 seconds (the step 
> 3 above took no time) and the crashes (Windows pops up with “the 
> program does not work anymore…” or something like that (I have a 
> German version).
>
> Any idea?
>
> Thanks
>
> Config data (running on Windows 10):
>
> | PROGRAM: topaz, Linear GemStone Interface (Remote 
> Session)               |
>
> | VERSION: 3.3.5, Thu May  4 11:44:37 2017 
>                                |
>
> | BUILD: gss64_3_3_x_branch-41643 |
>
> | BUILT FOR: x86-64/Windows7 |
>
> | MODE: 64 bit                |
>
> | RUNNING ON: 4-CPU haider-pc: Unknown CPU, Windows NT 6.2 build 
> 9200         |
>
> *Von:*Glass [mailto:glass-bounces at lists.gemtalksystems.com] *Im 
> Auftrag von *Dale Henrichs via Glass
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 11. Juli 2017 18:20
> *An:* glass at lists.gemtalksystems.com 
> <mailto:glass at lists.gemtalksystems.com>
> *Betreff:* Re: [Glass] Info on implementation limits
>
> Christian,
>
> Could you send me the full topaz log file? We need that to understand 
> what might be going on ...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dale
>
> On 7/11/17 1:07 AM, Christian Haider via Glass wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     are there any information about implementation limits of Gemstone
>     Smalltalk?
>
>     Concrete issue:
>
>     I try to input a source file (2.1. MB – can this work?).
>
>     Topaz dies (Windows reports that Topaz is not working anymore…)
>
>     Last thing in the log file is a method with 743 literals – is this
>     an issue?
>
>     My naïve theory: Gemstone (Topaz?) cannot compile the method, but
>     dies without error.
>
>     Any ideas?
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Christian
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Glass mailing list
>
>     Glass at lists.gemtalksystems.com <mailto:Glass at lists.gemtalksystems.com>
>
>     http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/private/glass/attachments/20170712/45cca3ad/attachment-0001.html>