[Glass] Jade 1.059: package extension naming ...

[Dale Henrichs via Glass]

Yes, the entry points for tODE and GemTools compilation is intended to
mimic the Pharo/Squeak API so if Jade is not making the same calls then the
behavior isn't likely to be the same either ...

Dale

On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 3:23 PM, James Foster via Glass <
glass at lists.gemtalksystems.com> wrote:

> The GLASS extensions and modifications to base classes update the package
> as modified if a newly added method is used. If previously existing methods
> are used the package is not updated. Unfortunately, the new method does not
> report compile errors. What I’m doing is calling both methods now and it
> seems to work. Let me know if this is fixed and if you see other issues.
>
> James
>
> > On Dec 2, 2014, at 6:15 AM, James Foster <
> james.foster at gemtalksystems.com> wrote:
> >
> > Marten,
> >
> > Thank you for this report. I think that it is related to the method used
> to compile code. I made a change to get back warnings as well as errors and
> it appears that this low-level method does not set the package properly. I
> will investigate and report back.
> >
> > James
> >
> >> On Dec 2, 2014, at 1:41 AM, itlists at schrievkrom.de via Glass <
> glass at lists.gemtalksystems.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I can anyone confirm this ? I'm working here further on with this
> >> version, but get not a very good feeling.
> >>
> >> If I add a method to an extension method category, this method is stored
> >> in the base package but also in the extension package. This at least can
> >> be seen in the Monticello packages created via Jade.
> >>
> >> I looked at the source code within Dolphin, but actually on a first
> >> quikck view I simply did not understand how the stuff is working.
> >>
> >>
> >> Marten
> >>
> >>> Am 27.11.2014 um 07:36 schrieb itlists at schrievkrom.de via Glass:
> >>> Something has changed in the behaviour of recognizing, that an
> extension
> >>> has changed.
> >>>
> >>> If I have a package named "Hallo" and "HalloExtension" and I add a
> >>> method category "*HalloExtension" to a class defined in "Hallo" and add
> >>> a method to that category, the system will not make any package "black"
> >>> (= changed).
> >>>
> >>> If I add a category "*halloextension" the system works as in in earlier
> >>> releases: the extension is "blacked".
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Marten Feldtmann
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Glass mailing list
> >> Glass at lists.gemtalksystems.com
> >> http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass
>
> _______________________________________________
> Glass mailing list
> Glass at lists.gemtalksystems.com
> http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/private/glass/attachments/20141207/6b0acdbe/attachment.html>