[Glass] GemStone's #on:do: could be cull: instead of value: ?

Mariano Martinez Peck marianopeck at gmail.com
Mon Jan 20 04:58:05 PST 2014

Hi guys,

Some weeks ago I noticed #on:do: behaved different than Pharo. Basically,
in Pharo, the argument of the do: is not mandatory while in GemStone it is.
So Pharo has a kind of #value: behavior while GemStone has #cull:.

Does ANSI Smalltalk say something about it? Do you have plans of making it
like Pharo behavior?
Maybe there are strong reason for let it as is?


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/private/glass/attachments/20140120/36af4453/attachment.html>

More information about the Glass mailing list