[Glass] GLASS 1.0-beta.9.2 released

[Johan Brichau]

I now compared the version methods of the different configurations and I don't see any changes to package versions between GLASS 1.0-beta.9 and GLASS 1.0-beta.9.2
Same applies for GsCore from 0.247 to 0.248

That is what I meant: if I upgrade from beta.9 to beta.9.2 on a GS 2.4 image, I don't get any new packages loaded (outside of the updated configurations).

The image I was using is close to 'virgin'. It's an image that comes with 1.0-beta.8.1 loaded and I used the gemtools to update it to beta.9.
I did that process over again (first loading beta.9) and I notice that once I load beta.9, the gemtools says that beta.9.2 is loaded.

So, my question was: this is intentional, right?

Now, why I got/get that name not found... I should look deeper.

Johan

On 24 Jun 2014, at 17:25, Dale Henrichs <dale.henrichs at gemtalksystems.com> wrote:

> Is it a virgin image? The change for 1.0-beta9.2 was only "cosmetic" when compared to 1.0-beta.9.1. I'll poke around a bit myself ... 
> 
> Dale
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Johan Brichau <johan at yesplan.be> wrote:
> Dale,
> 
> I have a gemstone 2.4 image with glass 1.0-beta.9 loaded.
> When I update the GLASS configuration, nothing gets loaded (no error either).
> 
> Loading like this: (ConfigurationOfGLASS project version:'1.0-beta.9.2') load
> Or using the Metacello api yield the same results.
> 
> Mind that in this image, I don't have the Preview installed.
> 
> Now, your reaction (and me looking deeper into the configuration) shows that this should not happen and at least a newer version of GsCore should be loaded.
> When I try to load using the gemtools menu, I get a name not found: 'GemStone-Exceptions'.
> 
> I'm diving deeper to get you better feedback...
> 
> Johan
> 
> ps: grrr... I want to get off of 2.4 because I did not have issues in 3.1 for this... this summer... must!
> 
> On 24 Jun 2014, at 16:07, Dale Henrichs <dale.henrichs at gemtalksystems.com> wrote:
> 
> > Johan,
> >
> > Sorry, not sure what you mean by this ... the change in the configuration should apply to both GemStone2.x and GemStone3.x ...
> >
> > Dale
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Johan Brichau <johan at yesplan.be> wrote:
> > Hi Dale,
> >
> > Thanks for this new update!
> > Is it correct that for GS 2.4, there are no changes?
> >
> > Johan
> >
> > On 24 Jun 2014, at 00:41, Dale Henrichs <dale.henrichs at gemtalksystems.com> wrote:
> >
> > > GLASS 1.0-beta.9.2 fixes the dreaded "Name not found OB-Metacello" bug[1] that has been popping up in a number of different contexts lately ...
> > >
> > > The bug was ultimately caused by a reference to the OB-Metacello from the GLASS configuration even though the package is not supported in later versions of Metacello, but it would only show up if you had loaded the Metacello Preview which many of you have done ...
> > >
> > > If you have been bitten or get bitten by the "Name not found OB-Metacello" bug just upgrade to GLASS 1.0-beta.9.2 and the problem should go away ... if not let me know and I will keep chasing that guy  until he is put down for good:)
> > >
> > > Dale
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/dalehenrich/metacello-work/issues/250
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Glass mailing list
> > > Glass at lists.gemtalksystems.com
> > > http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass
> >
> >
> 
>