[Glass] Zinc 2.4.3 on Gemstone

[Dale Henrichs]

Johan,

Yes, I was thinking a bit (dangerous I know:) and concluded that any work
on 3.2 should be preceded by work on 3.1 ...

This is not to say that all other issues will be ignored, but 3.1 is
production now and 3.2 is production soon (BTW, we have a 3.2.1 in the
works that everyone should plan to use when it is released ... important
bugfixes) so my inclination is to focus on (as a straw man):

  - Seaside31 and Zinc on GemStone3.1 ... green tests
  - Seaside31 and Zinc on GemStone 3.2 ... address show stoppers

Dale


On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Johan Brichau <johan at yesplan.be> wrote:

>
> On 21 May 2014, at 15:06, Dale Henrichs <dale.henrichs at gemtalksystems.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Marching Orders! Very good ...
>
> Haha :-)
> Seriously, I just wanted to make sure that if I did something useful that
> it would not go to waste.
>
> > Johan, Gerhard, et. al., I want to follow your lead and fill in where
> the work is needed …
>
> That sounds great. I definitely am not dropping the ball on this one but I
> need a sparring partner with better knowledge on what I changed in that
> pull request.
> The remaining failing tests are about gzip compression.
>
> > Do you guys think that getting Seaside/Zinc/etc. ported to GemStone3.2
> takes precedence over getting Zinc running on GemStone3.1?
>
> Not really. I think getting everything working on 3.1 is a must
> I did the Zinc port on 2.4 but I’m happy to focus on 3.1 only too. We’re
> getting really close to moving to 3.1 now… (sigh :-)
>
> cheers
> Johan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/private/glass/attachments/20140521/412ef807/attachment.html>