[Glass] RefactoringBrowser (RB) failing to correctly bind "self" in closures?

[Mariano Martinez Peck via Glass]

Dale, now I remembered  a question...

Why rb project entry is PER STONE (that is,
$GS_HOME/sys/local/server/stones/devKit_329/projects/RB.ston) while the
other projects loaded by tODE (for example, Ston) are shared (that is,
$GS_HOME/GsDevKit_home/sys/default/server/projects/* )

?

Thanks in advance,

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Dale Henrichs <
dale.henrichs at gemtalksystems.com> wrote:

> BTW, if any other GsDevKit_home user wants to pick up the RB bugfixes do
> the following:
>
>   updateGsDevKit -st
>
> update shared repos and tODE repos ... do not update clients as RB is only
> used on the server.
>
> Then for each of the tODE stones you are using (and want updated):
>
>   todeUpdate <stone-name>
>
> Dale
>
>
> On 11/23/2015 12:36 PM, Dale Henrichs wrote:
>
> Tests were green, so I merged your pull request ... thanks!
>
> Dale
>
> On 11/23/2015 11:47 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>
> OK Dale,
>
> Can you check if everything went correct with my PR?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Dale Henrichs <
> dale.henrichs at gemtalksystems.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 11/23/2015 05:12 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Dale Henrichs <
>> <dale.henrichs at gemtalksystems.com>dale.henrichs at gemtalksystems.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Cool ....
>>>
>>> Now, tODE only loads AST-Core and I just checked and there _was_ only
>>> one test error (a test problem that I just fixed), so you must be using
>>> other parts of RB ....
>>>
>>> Perhaps we could do a mini sprint for RB and get the tests passing for
>>> more of the system?
>>>
>>> If you are interested perhaps you could let me know what sub-systems you
>>> are using and we could divvy up the tests?
>>>
>>>
>> I am supposed to be using the AST-Core package. However, it seems that
>> even in Pharo, there is no test that covers my scenario.
>>
>> haha, well this cuts down the scope of the RB sprint ... the 100's of
>> faiing tests were in the other parts of RB that aren't loaded with
>> AST-Core....
>>
>>
>> Before I fork and commit the fix, let me ask...shouldn't we move RB from
>> dalehenrichs into gsDevKitHome?   even more because it's even used by tODE
>> right?  I guess you will need to update a couple of things of gsDevKit_home
>> scripts in order to get the new repo, but probably worth.
>> Anyway, let me know what do you think.
>>
>> I would say that you can go ahead and fork my repo ... when It is moved
>> to GsDevKit, ownership will be re-assigned so the repo will move and your
>> fork will point to the GsDevKit version ... to keep old things working, I
>> will make a new fork of rb ....
>>
>> replacing the cloned repo will be a bit dicier but can be done with a
>> little work .. something that I don't necessarily want to have to deal with
>> at the moment:)
>>
>> Dale
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Mariano
> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
>
>
>
>


-- 
Mariano
http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/private/glass/attachments/20151123/ea4bd686/attachment.html>