[Glass] Throw away all 32bit code from the installation code ...

[itlists@schrievkrom.de via Glass]

Both is possible, but http_proxy is the usual one.


Marten

Am 10.09.2015 um 18:59 schrieb Dale Henrichs via Glass:
> I was asking the question in the context of this comment:
> 
> 
> 
> On 09/10/2015 01:22 AM, itlists at schrievkrom.de via Glass wrote:
>> Am 09.09.2015 um 02:14 schrieb Dale Henrichs:
>>
>>> When we worked at VMWare I was able to get both Pharo and GemStone to
>>> function behind a proxy, so I know that it is possible ... Could you
>>> share with me the information that you have about the proxy and I will
>>> tell you the Smalltalk expressions that you should execute to get
>>> GemStone and Pharo working from behind the proxy ...
>> Well, its simple. I get a proxy address with a port - and all stuff must
>> run via this proxy.
> 
> Okay then to turn on http proxying in your GemStone stone you would do
> the following:
> 
>   HTTPSocket
>     httpProxyServer: 'proxy address';
>     httpProxyPort: port.
>   System commitTransaction.
> 
> After executing those commands Gofer will use the http proxy for all
> proxy requests .... There is a similar technique that can be applied in
> a Pharo vm.
> 
> I opened the bug[1] because I would expect that gsDevKitHome could run
> the above commands as part of the stone creation process based on the
> settings of the http_proxy and https_proxy or ???.
> 
> In your environment are you using http_proxy and https_proxy?
> 
> Dale
> 
> [1] https://github.com/GsDevKit/gsDevKitHome/issues/85
> _______________________________________________
> Glass mailing list
> Glass at lists.gemtalksystems.com
> http://lists.gemtalksystems.com/mailman/listinfo/glass


-- 
Marten Feldtmann